(This is guaranteed to burn the muffins and turn heads)
So, you have heard of the ‘theory’ of the big bang?
You have maybe heard of the ‘theory’ of relativity?
Naturally you have heard of the thirty conflicting ‘theories’ of who killed JFK.
I have my own theory as to what busybody emailed a potential penalty on Lexi Thompson which cost her the first LPGA’s first major of 2017.
The trouble with theories is, they are exaggerated opinions, clever guesses, some better than others, some create more fog, are for the most part still unprovable, but far too many are put forth as gospel truth. There are many Theories that are bones without a body.
The so-called big bang. Bang? I think the Creation by God was rather unassuming, demure as it were, introduced as the morning overtakes a night. Just the beautiful voice of God. Quiet. Elegant. No screeching metal such as a train wreck. No, but more like the silent visual awe of lightning or the impression of a wheat field, the unspeakable wonder of those glimmering lights known as stars, you know, those ‘lights,’ not a colored rock with borrowed lumens, but lights, such as which baffles the likes of General Electric.
Mr Einstein’s ‘theory’ of relativity was an answer to the need for gravity, which was dismissed by the Michelson-Morley experiment as well as Tesla. You see, others have equally valid theories, and even more truthful:
Tesla was critical of Einstein stating that his theory of relativity was “a beggar wrapped in purple whom ignorant people take for a king” and “a mass of error and deceptive ideas violently opposed to the teachings of great men of science of the past and even to common sense… the theory wraps all these errors and fallacies and clothes them in magnificent mathematical garb which fascinates, dazzles and makes people blind to the underlying errors…. its exponents are very brilliant men, but they are metaphysicists rather than scientists. Not a single one of the relativity propositions has been proved.”
Bang bang! Hmmm. How do you spell Nye, DeGrasse, Hawking? Do you see how the smokescreens of the theorists create diversions, whereby only the so called elite are qualified to address the issues of life? (So glad here that God does not play hide-n-seek, and welcomes the pure in heart.)
So with what sanity do we say a stream of water or a river moves, but our eyes lie to us as to the moving sun, which sun we see with the same eyes, while others try to convince us of a THEORY that it is not moving? Talk about faith to turn a blind eye to the obvious! But we worship our theories and call that science.
Theories apart from truth are simply Hollywood material bought and sold to the public as fact.
Fact: And God called the dry land Earth; and the gathering together of the waters called he Seas: and God saw that it was good.
Fact: God made the greater light to rule the day.
Fact: God made the lesser light to rule the night. (again, not a borrowed light given to a dark rock)
Fact: And God created great whales.
But if I am wrong as to the theory of a quiet creation, we can always go with this:
God thundereth marvellously with his voice; great things doeth he, which we cannot comprehend.
or this language of God’s majesty upon response to His dotting the heavens with lights:
When the morning stars sang together,
or consider what we are blind to:
By the breath of God frost is given: and the breadth of the waters is straitened.
or answer such questions which should put a lock on our tongue:
Where wast thou when I laid the foundations of the earth? declare, if thou hast understanding.
Hast thou with him spread out the sky, which is strong, and as a molten looking glass?
So theories? Eh, a dime a dozen, even the good ones are weak at best. But God’s word? No theories. Plain truth as it should be. The whole creation sings the praises of the divine hand.