Evo and Groucho

Can you bear the thought of an animal choosing its identity? Can you imagine for an instance the sheer stupidity of thinking a tiger chose its own stripes? Sure you can, if, and I say IF you are honest.

Image result for bear

Evolution is the bastard child of the wicked step mother godlessness, where that mother’s household traffics in covert operations, stewing and stirring the poisoned pot of depraved nutrition, fed to they who have teeth which only seeks to ravage, as it pretends to hold the golden apple of vitality.

Image result for witches cauldron

Evolution, as I use it, is ALL creation apart from God, left to the hands of ‘accidental existence.’ Without purpose, without design, without deference to the Designer.

Image result for tiger

If Evo was true, then the tiger would birth a monkey, the elephant could comfortably birth a bear,  a man could marry a goldfish, or a woman could wake up one day and be a man. Oops……  No! Common sense says ‘go away ye cauldron of godlessness.’

Stop pretending that intellect is possible such as men can walk on ceilings like ants. Wake up already and see that KINDS are the Creator’s business, and it is pointless to put asunder what God has joined.

Whales do not, cannot, and will not ever walk on the earth like the circus ringmaster boasts.  The Creator has not joined them to the company of elephants or bears, any more than eagles can swim at 20  thousand fathoms under the sea. AFTER THEIR KIND is a truth so obvious that evo should be so embarrassed to promote such foolishness cloaked as knowledge.

Image result for whales

Know what I say to godless evolution? Pack your bags, and take your rotted trunk with you. It’s a good think animals don’t talk in English, I suppose they would embarrass us with their natural understanding of where they belong, and why they will never be human. Monkeys be damned!Image result for elephant

Oh wait I know, this has been the greatest joke of all, founded and perpetuated by folks such as the Marx bros, who have simply wanted a little reprieve from the knowledge that God’s word is very good, most excellent even, and that a little time in the shade is a good thing, Nathanael like, but then, back to the sobriety of scriptural truth, which presents answers to all the issues of life.

Image result for groucho marx

Advertisements

About ColorStorm

Blending the colorful issues of life with the unapologetic truth of scripture.
This entry was posted in God and science and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

15 Responses to Evo and Groucho

  1. That the Creator exists, there is no doubt.

    But there is also no doubt that every living creature possesses DNA and is defined by it.

    That means all life, including human life is related.

    Like

  2. ColorStorm says:

    Tkx SoM, but i would disagree that all living things are related by dna if that is what you are saying.

    In relation perhaps to ‘nearness,’ yes, maybe, but not actually, for the lion that you are related to would just as quickly tear your head off before he lies down without shame to take his nap.

    On the other hand, I have no desire to harm either cardinal or dove.

    I am not related to either bear or whale in this manner, if only to agree that we are both alive.

    Like

  3. Storm,

    It’s not what I say, it’s what the facts say.

    DNA is THE molecule that defines each and every living creature.

    Because the properties of each creature are defined by the DNA molecule, all life is related down to the molecular level.

    That’s deeper than bone deep.

    Recently, I was part of a group of students who discovered a new partial gene in a plant.

    Because we were looking at a species of plant that was uncharted, we used its close genetic (DNA)relationship with other plants in the same family to keep us going in the right direction.

    Without the close molecular relationship between species or kinds, of plants, we would not have been able to make our discovery.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. Something I always find interesting, the biblical rules about blood, cross contamination,cleanliness. Most of our dreaded diseases have to do with interspecies blood to blood contact that mutated some virus or bacteria. Rats, fleas actually spread the plague, monkeys gave us HIV, the bird flu, the swine flu,and what have you. We are all indeed very different. Even when they cross breed certain animals, they’re often unable to reproduce, missing vital pieces, possessing odd numbers of chromosomes. Hybrids are usually sterile,like zebra donkeys.

    Liked by 2 people

    • ColorStorm says:

      Good point about the blood. A bloodless faith is no faith, but still, I’m not sure why people have issue separating man from beast.

      If I recall, the common fox, bless him immensely, does not possess the breath of God that makes him a living soul, immediately and forcefully separating him from us. It is not a question of fact at all.

      Your ‘very different’ is spot on in every respect. After all, can I borrow your this thing called biology msb?? lol

      Liked by 1 person

    • Interspecies blood-born diseases demonstrate that man is actually a blood relative to the creatures around him.

      Liked by 1 person

  5. Tricia says:

    Potatoes, monkeys and blood born diseases? Such interesting comments, making me once again happy I stopped by the Lion’s Den. As to your post? Brilliant as usual, I don’t have much to add other than to agree that yes, a tiger most certainly does not choose his own stripes!

    Liked by 1 person

  6. Citizen Tom says:

    Whether God produced all the wondrous varieties of life on this planet I don’t know. If the various forms of life on this planet were not related, however, that would be quite problematic. Most people don’t know enough chemistry to understand the difficulty, but here it is in a nutshell. What if all the other forms of life on this planet were basically alien, that the genetic code of each life form on planet earth was striking different. Well, if you tried to eat Mr. Potato, you would be lucky if you just found that potato indigestible. Most like that potato would kill you.

    Here is an example of the chemistry problem. Molecules have shapes, that is the atoms that from a specific compound are arranged in a particular geometrical structure. So it is possible, for example, to create two molecules that are mirror images of each other. Of those two mirror images, your body can use one, but no the other.

    If we ever discover life on another planet, I expect we are going to have to be extremely careful we don’t contaminate that planet with simple life forms from earth and vice versa. The chemistry could be so incompatible who knows what might happen. That is definitely something we will want to test in a laboratory with lab rats before we try it with people.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s